Movie · 2023 · Thriller, Mystery, Crime · 2h 31m · R · French
Curator score: 9.1/10 (1.6M ratings)
Did she do it?
Overview
A woman is suspected of her husband's murder, and their blind son faces a moral dilemma as the sole witness.
Ratings
Curator score: 9.1/10
IMDb: 7.6/10
Letterboxd: 4.12/5
Rotten Tomatoes: 96%
Metacritic: 86
TMDB: 7.5/10
Director
Justine Triet
Production
Les Films de Pierre, Les Films Pelléas, France 2 Cinéma, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Cinéma
Cast
Sandra Hüller, Swann Arlaud, Milo Machado-Graner, Antoine Reinartz, Samuel Theis, Jehnny Beth, Saadia Bentaïeb, Camille Rutherford, Anne Rotger, Sophie Fillières, Julien Comte, Pierre-François Garel, Savannah Rol, Iliès Kadri, Vincent Courcelle-Labrousse, Cécile Brunet-Ludet, Nesrine Slaoui, Antoine Bueno, Anne-Lise Heimburger, Wajdi Mouawad
Where to watch
Netflix, Netflix Standard with Ads
Curator Review
Verdict
A sharp, adult courtroom thriller that uses a murder investigation to probe marriage, language, memory, and power. It’s as much a psychological drama as a whodunit, with a cool, precise style and a standout central performance.
Best for
viewers who like intelligent legal dramas and moral ambiguity
fans of slow-burn psychological thrillers
people interested in relationship autopsies and unreliable testimony
audiences who appreciate strong acting and scene-by-scene argumentation
Skip if
you want a fast, twist-heavy crime thriller
you prefer clear-cut answers and tidy resolutions
you dislike courtroom dialogue and extended testimony
you’re looking for a conventional detective mystery
Overview
Anatomy of a Fall is a courtroom drama that keeps widening its lens. What begins as a suspicious death becomes a study of marriage under pressure, then a brutal examination of how stories get built from fragments, bias, and performance. The film is patient, exacting, and often unsettling in how little certainty it offers.
Worth noting
Justine Triet stages the trial with real dramatic momentum, but the most gripping element is the way every witness statement feels like a negotiation over truth. Sandra Hüller is superb: controlled, opaque, and never reducible to a single interpretation. The film trusts viewers to sit with contradiction rather than solve it.
Bottom line
It also has a dry wit and a keen sense of social observation, which keeps the tension from becoming airless. This is prestige filmmaking with teeth: intelligent, emotionally thorny, and built to linger after the credits.
Top Letterboxd reviews
Dan Py (5★) · 55295 likes
I thought the husband was a DJ cooking up a banger upstairs
amaya (4★) · 51067 likes
what if the husband was vibing too hard to that 50 cent instrumental and he just danced himself out of the window
David Sims (4★) · 34582 likes
damn french trials are crazy they’re reading novels and having panel discussions and shit
cillemouze (4★) · 32804 likes
Lil boy: when we dont understand what happened we should try to understand why it happened
Judge:👁👄👁
Ali (4.5★) · 31678 likes
how am I supposed to respect “French people” when their court system is so foolish. Prosecutor can just say things like “this woman is bisexual so zat means all she know eez eat hot chip kill husband plunder book and lie” and jury will take you seriously. Foolish country
2007 · Crime, Mystery, Thriller · 2h 37m · R · Curator 8.4/10 (2.4M ratings) · Where to watch: Paramount Plus Premium, Paramount Plus Essential
A meticulous investigation film that understands obsession, ambiguity, and the frustration of incomplete answers.
Topics
courtroom drama, psychological thriller, mystery, legal procedural, marital breakdown, moral ambiguity, slow burn, prestige drama, French cinema, character study