A docudrama depicting a hypothetical nuclear attack on Britain. After backing the film's development, the BBC refused to air it, publicly stating "the effect of the film has been judged by the BBC to be too horrifying for the medium of broadcasting." It debuted in theaters in 1966 and went on to great acclaim, but remained unseen on British television until 1985.
Ratings
Curator score: 8.8/10
IMDb: 7.9/10
Letterboxd: 4.08/5
Rotten Tomatoes: 93%
TMDB: 7.7/10
Director
Peter Watkins
Production
BBC
Cast
Michael Aspel, Kathy Staff, Peter Watkins, Peter Graham
Curator Review
Verdict
A devastating, rigorously staged faux-documentary that makes nuclear war feel bureaucratic, immediate, and horrifyingly plausible. Short, severe, and still unnerving, it’s one of the most effective anti-war films ever made.
Best for
viewers interested in nuclear-war cinema
fans of docudrama and pseudo-documentary form
people who like bleak political cinema
students of Cold War history and media criticism
audiences seeking a compact but intense watch
Skip if
you want a conventional narrative with character arcs
you’re sensitive to graphic aftermath imagery and distressing wartime realism
you prefer hopeful or cathartic war films
you dislike didactic, report-like filmmaking
Overview
Peter Watkins turns a hypothetical nuclear strike on Britain into something that feels less imagined than administratively inevitable. The film’s faux-newsreel style, clipped narration, and matter-of-fact institutional language create a chilling sense that catastrophe is not only possible but already planned for in the worst possible way.
Worth noting
What makes it so powerful is its refusal to soften the consequences. The film moves quickly, but every image lands hard: panic, fire, injury, social breakdown, and the collapse of public order are rendered with grim precision. Its low-budget immediacy becomes an asset, making the whole thing feel disturbingly close to reality.
Bottom line
Even decades later, it remains one of the most uncompromising anti-nuclear films ever made. It’s not an easy watch, but it is an essential one for anyone interested in how cinema can simulate truth in order to expose political complacency.
Top Letterboxd reviews
Justin Decloux (5★) · 632 likes
BBC: Mr. Watkins, good chap, can you make us a wee faux documentary on the effects of the Nuclear War on Merry Ole' England?
PETER WATKINS: Okay.
***Watkins finishes the project and shows it to BBC***
BBC: WHAT THE FUCK! WHAT! NO! WHY DID YOU FUCKING MAKE IT SO FUCKING REAL, YOU FUCK! FUCK! NOOOOOOO! WE CAN'T SHOW A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT THE EFFECTS OF NUCLEAR WAR ON FUCKING ENGLAND! FUCCCCCCCCKKKKKK!
PETER WATKINS: Welp, I hope this doesn't happen with every other future film I make!
*slide whistle sound*
Eli Hayes (5★) · 507 likes
I know that the majority of this film is "fictional," but the fact that it's a government funded film which essentially demonstrates the horrific course of action that the government would take in the event of nuclear warfare makes it incredibly haunting. Some of the scenes and imagery in this film are unforgettably bleak; at only 48 minutes, it's much, much heavier than most films three times its length and makes perfectly good use of every second of its runtime.… more I know that the majority of this film is "fictional," but the fact that it's a government funded film which essentially demonstrates the horrific course of action that the government would take in the event of nuclear warfare makes it incredibly haunting. Some of the scenes and imagery in this film are unforgettably bleak; at only 48 minutes, it's much, much heavier than most films three times its length and makes perfectly good use of every second of its runtime.… more
Paul Elliott (5★) · 196 likes
Carved out in the style of a documentary, Peter Watkins portrayal of a hypothetical nuclear war on Britain and its effects is profoundly horrifying.
Financed by the BBC who decided against broadcasting it, even after it started to get prestigious international recognition, for almost twenty years as they didn't want to offend the government as it entirely dismantles their official mid-sixties civil defence guidelines. It's based primarily on situations and circumstances witnessed in Dresden and the bombings on Hiroshima and… more
Will Sloan (5★) · 136 likes
I will do ok if this happens. I've seen the cartoon. I know to "duck and cover."
chavel (4★) · 106 likes
46-minutes long, just right. The War Game is a faux-documentary on what happens to Great Britain before, during and after a nuclear warhead attack. The war is between Red China and The United States, building on some Vietnam fracas which is stewing tensions between rivals, i.e., the Soviet Union is backing China; resulting with imperialist countries going at each other. England is neutral, however, it is full of military station targets. Citizens are harangued to read booklet information on how… more 46-minutes long, just right. The War Game is a faux-documentary on what happens to Great Britain before, during and after a nuclear warhead attack. The war is between Red China and The United States, building on some Vietnam fracas which is stewing tensions between rivals, i.e., the Soviet Union is backing China; resulting with imperialist countries going at each other. England is neutral, however, it is full of military station targets. Citizens are harangued to read booklet information on how… more